Webb21 maj 2024 · t.Wait() instead of your loop. However, really, you should try to make this code async, and use instead: Console.WriteLine(await t); Note that your Main method in … Webb18 mars 2024 · RunSynchronous specifies one or more commands to run during the windowsPE configuration pass. Synchronous commands start in the order that you …
Task.RunSynchronously 方法 (System.Threading.Tasks)
Webb26 aug. 2024 · You should go all way down with async/await. If you are using ".GetAwaiter ().GetResult ()", ".Result" or ".Wait ()" to get the result of a task or to wait for the task completion you may experience deadlocks or thread pool starvation. Webb17 juni 2024 · Naming it RunSynchronously would match Async.RunSynchronously, but shouldn't, because the two are very different in this regard. Async is more like a Func and can be run many times. The task {} block is already running and invoking .Result will only block for its result, not run it again. melissa burgess hickory nc
c#多线程_修炼成精的博客-CSDN博客
My initial thought is RunSynchronously is for calling an async method and running that synchronously without causing a deadlock issue like what .wait() does. However, according to MSDN , Ordinarily, tasks are executed asynchronously on a thread pool thread and do not block the calling thread. Webb19 mars 2024 · 解决方法: Systemverilog 引入了triggered()函数,用于检测某个事件是否已被触发过,包括正在触发。 线程可以等待这个结果,而不用在@操作符上阻塞。 例子: event a; // 使用关键字event来声明一个事件a initia l begin # 1; - > a; end initia l begin # 1; @a; // 第一个进程在 1 ns后触发了事件a,那么第二个进程在 1 ns的时候等待a,有可能等 … Webb30 maj 2013 · Message=RunSynchronously may not be called on a task that was already started. Source=mscorlib StackTrace: at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.InternalRunSynchronously(TaskScheduler scheduler, Boolean waitForCompletion) at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.RunSynchronously() at … melissa burrell commerce bank